Finished
| 31' | A. Camara | ||
| 32' | M. Abbey | ||
| 53' |
D. Irimia
Y. Zakir
|
||
| 62' |
L. Mihai
F. Iacob
|
||
| 62' |
M. Tutu
D. Barbu
|
||
| 69' |
C. Kouadio
M. Abbey
|
||
| 69' |
R. Milea
L. Lis
|
||
| 72' |
H. Abdallah
M. Coman
|
||
| 74' |
(D. Alomerovic)
M. Coman
|
1 : 0 | |
| 76' |
S. Visic
E. Fernandes
|
||
| 76' |
R. Neacsu
A. Sava
|
||
| 82' |
V. Costache
A. Padula
|
||
| 84' |
A. Roman
|
||
| 86' |
(A. Roman)
D. Pospelov
|
2 : 0 |
Wins
Draw
Wins
2/5 Matches
3/5 Matches
3/5 Matches
2/5 Matches
Wins
Draw
Wins
7/9 Matches
7/9 Matches
7/9 Matches
7/9 Matches
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
18 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 16 | 17 | 38 | W L W D W |
| 2 |
|
18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 30 | 14 | 16 | 36 | W D L D W |
| 3 |
|
19 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 28 | 16 | 12 | 35 | D W D W W |
| 4 |
|
18 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 29 | 19 | 10 | 33 | D W L D D |
| 5 |
|
19 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 19 | 7 | 33 | W W L L W |
| 6 |
|
19 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 28 | 17 | 11 | 27 | W L D D W |
| 7 |
|
19 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 24 | 19 | 5 | 27 | W D W W L |
| 8 |
|
19 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 25 | 23 | 2 | 26 | L L D W W |
| 9 |
|
19 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 27 | 25 | 2 | 25 | D W D D W |
| 10 |
|
18 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 22 | 28 | -6 | 25 | W L W W L |
| 11 |
|
18 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 19 | W D D D D |
| 12 |
|
18 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 24 | 31 | -7 | 19 | L W W L L |
| 13 |
|
19 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 18 | 27 | -9 | 18 | L L L L L |
| 14 |
|
19 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 20 | 40 | -20 | 16 | L L W L L |
| 15 |
|
19 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 16 | 32 | -16 | 12 | L L D D L |
| 16 |
|
19 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 39 | -22 | 11 | W L D L L |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 21 | W D L D W |
| 2 |
|
9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 9 | 12 | 20 | W L W D W |
| 3 |
|
9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 20 | D W L D D |
| 4 |
|
10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 18 | W L D D W |
| 5 |
|
9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 18 | D W D W W |
| 6 |
|
9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 17 | L L D W W |
| 7 |
|
9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 16 | W W L L W |
| 8 |
|
9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 13 | W L W W L |
| 9 |
|
9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 12 | D W D D W |
| 10 |
|
9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 12 | L W W L L |
| 11 |
|
11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 12 | L L W L L |
| 12 |
|
10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 | W D W W L |
| 13 |
|
9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 10 | L L L L L |
| 14 |
|
9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 9 | W D D D D |
| 15 |
|
10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 9 | W L D L L |
| 16 |
|
9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 6 | L L D D L |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 18 | W L W D W |
| 2 |
|
10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 17 | D W D W W |
| 3 |
|
10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 17 | W W L L W |
| 4 |
|
9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 16 | W D W W L |
| 5 |
|
9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 15 | W D L D W |
| 6 |
|
9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 13 | D W L D D |
| 7 |
|
10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 13 | D W D D W |
| 8 |
|
9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 12 | W L W W L |
| 9 |
|
9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 | W D D D D |
| 10 |
|
9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 | W L D D W |
| 11 |
|
10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 9 | L L D W W |
| 12 |
|
10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 8 | L L L L L |
| 13 |
|
9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 | L W W L L |
| 14 |
|
10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 6 | L L D D L |
| 15 |
|
8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 4 | L L W L L |
| 16 |
|
9 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 2 | W L D L L |
Uta Arad has experienced a challenging season with fluctuating form, mainly struggling to convert chances and maintain defensive stability. Metaloglobus, meanwhile, has shown signs of resilience, with particular improvements in midfield control. Currently, Uta holds a lower league position but aims for a turnaround at home.
The last five fixtures between Uta Arad and Metaloglobus have been highly competitive, with their victories evenly split and goal margins often narrow. Historically, the rivalry has delivered intense battles, often decided by set-pieces or a single moment of brilliance.
Uta Arad’s key player is their attacking midfielder who has been a creative force, providing both scoring and assist opportunities. Metaloglobus counters with their experienced winger, known for pace and dribbling, capable of unlocking tight defenses. Duel highlights: their contrasting attacking styles could influence the game.
Uta Arad is likely to line up in a 4-4-2 formation, prioritizing disciplined defense and swift counterattacks, especially through their wingers. Metaloglobus might adopt a 4-2-3-1 or similar setup, with flexible midfielders supporting wing play and forward runs, depending on tactical adjustments.
Uta Arad’s manager is expected to emphasize defensive organization and quick transitions, especially to compensate for recent goal-scoring struggles. Metaloglobus’s tactician is focused on controlling possession and exploiting spaces through quick passing and set-pieces. Strategic adjustments may be decisive in this encounter.
The match between Uta Arad and Metaloglobus will take place on November 2, 2025, at Arena Francisc Neuman in Arad. The fixture kicks off at 13:30 UTC. Fans in Romania can watch live via local broadcasters, while international viewers should check streaming options provided by the league's official partners.
This match will likely hinge on midfield battles and set-piece effectiveness, with both teams seeking to improve goal conversion. Fans should expect a tactical duel, with defensive solidity and quick counters shaping the fixture. Key battles in wide areas could decide the outcome.
Uta Arad averages 0.4 goals per game and concedes around 2.2, reflecting defensive vulnerabilities. Metaloglobus scores approximately 0.8 goals, with a conceding rate near 1.8. Their recent head-to-head shows a balanced rivalry with tight scorelines, emphasizing the importance of set-pieces and midfield control.
Set pieces could be crucial, with Uta Arad having scored from corners and free-kicks earlier this season. Metaloglobus boasts strong aerial defense, making the aerial duel in the box pivotal. Strategic set-piece routines could unlock the defenses and influence the final result.
Uta Arad prefers a structured 4-4-2, focusing on defensive discipline and rapid counters through their wingers. Metaloglobus favors a possession-based 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1, aiming to control the game with short passing and rotate players to find gaps. This tactical clash will shape the game's tempo.
Uta Arad’s squad remains largely intact, with no significant injuries reported. Metaloglobus has a few players nursing minor knocks, but no key absences are expected. Both teams are expected to field their strongest lineups for this important fixture.
The match is scheduled at Arena Francisc Neuman, a venue known for its passionate crowd and compact pitch. Uta Arad typically performs better on home soil, where the crowd adds to the atmosphere. Environmental factors like pitch size and weather may influence playing styles and tempo.